Lori Bongiorno

Three CFL myths busted

image name and credit

The benefits associated with using compact fluorescent bulbs are hardly a secret. Each CFL uses about 75% less energy than an incandescent bulb, lasts longer, and saves about $30 over the course of its lifetime.  

For every benefit, though, it seems there is a compelling reason to avoid these energy efficient bulbs. In most circumstances, it's simply a case of mispercentions blown out of proportion. 

Here are the facts behind three common myths: 

 

Myth: Compact fluorescent bulbs are a major safety hazard because they contain mercury.

Fact: Yes, it's true that CFLs contain tiny amounts of mercury, and if a bulb breaks you will be exposed to the neurotoxin. But, just how dangerous is a broken bulb? Researchers at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory set out to answer that question. They compared how much exposure you'd get from breathing in the amount of mercury released from a broken CFL bulb to how much mercury you'd take in from eating Albacore tuna.

If you do a common sense job of cleaning up (open the windows, clean up, and remove the debris), then your mercury exposure would be the equivalent of taking a tiny nibble of tuna, according to Francis Rubinstein, a staff scientist at Berkeley Lab. What if you did the worst job possible, say closed all the doors and smashed the bulb with a hammer? It's still no big deal, says Rubinstein, who points out that it would be the equivalent of eating one can of tuna.


 
Myth: You don't really save energy by using compact fluorescent bulbs because they take so much energy to make and ship.

Fact: The amount of energy required to manufacture, transport, and dispose of an item is called "embodied energy." For a CFL, the embodied energy is about 4% of the bulb's total energy use, according to an essay published in LD+A, the magazine of the Illuminating Engineer Society, last December.

The scientists found that it takes about 1 to 2 kilowatt-hours of energy to make and ship a compact fluorescent bulb (even those made in China), but it saves at least 200 kilowatt-hours of energy over its lifetime. At the typical price of electricity, it costs about 25 cents worth of energy to make a fluorescent bulb, a trivial amount when you consider the tens of dollars of electricity saved over the life of a CFL, says Rubinstein, who co-authored the essay. 


Myth: It's not worth it to replace your incandescent bulbs with more energy efficient lighting because you'll end up spending more on heating bills to make up for the lost heat thrown off by incandescent bulbs.

Fact: It's true that incandescent bulbs give off heat that can help to keep your home warm. But, Rubinstein points out that it's only a tiny amount. There are a number of factors that can impact the amount of money and energy you save by switching to CFLs (or other more efficient lighting).

If you live in a cold climate (in an insulated house), losing ambient heat from those old inefficient incandescent bulbs may increase your heating bill slightly, but you'll save more on overall energy costs because of the electricity you'll save on lighting. If you live in a warm climate, you might even rack up more savings since you won't need to use as much air conditioning. Rubinstein's bottom line: You're almost always going to save money when you replace an incandescent with a CFL, but you may not save quite as much during the heating season in a cold climate.

Environmental journalist Lori Bongiorno shares green-living tips and product reviews with Yahoo! Green's users. Send Lori a question or suggestion for potential use in a future column. Her book, Green Greener Greenest: A Practical Guide to Making Eco-smart Choices a Part of Your Life is available on Yahoo! Shopping and Amazon.com.

Email IM Bookmark del.icio.us Digg

You do not appear to have Yahoo! Messenger installed. Click here to download and install it.

Email this article

There is a problem with one or more email addresses entered

Enter email addresses, separated by commas.

There is a problem with the email address entered

Email addresses will only be used to email this information on your behalf and will not be used for any marketing purposes.

Alerts

Get an alert for updates:
  • from this author
  • on China
  • on Electricity
  • on Lights
  • on Saving energy at home

View All Green Alerts »

comments from our community

Showing 1 - 15 of 132 comments

Post Comment
  • Posted by a0_1_filet_mignon Thu May 7, 2009 10:13pm PDT
    What about the radiation factor? One of the least mentioned issues with CFLs are the amount of radiation they give off compared to incandescant bulbs. Put a Gauss meter near a CFL and you will see it quickly go into the "danger" zone. CFLs might save money but they're high radiation may cause health problems.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by achuertas Fri May 8, 2009 8:25am PDT
    It's also worth noting that coal-fired power plants produce mercury that goes into our air and water. When you use a CFL, you reduce the amount of mercury produced through coal-burning. If you properly dispose of your CFL's, you're creating a big net benefit in reducing mercury pollution. Aaron Huertas Union of Concerned Scientists ahuertas@ucsusa.org
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Tom1100 Sat May 9, 2009 3:26am PDT
    I am a big fan of CFLs. Some people may have had bad experiences with some of the early offerings, but the manufacturers have made great strides in a short time. They are now available in different color temperatures so you don't feel like Tom Hanks in Joe vs the Volcano, and some don't have that annoying delay when you turn them on. Unfortunately they still won't fit in many light fixtures.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Nobama Sat May 9, 2009 6:14pm PDT
    The light quality is terrible ! To light the room you walk in turn on the light and go about your business elsewhere...then come back when there is actually light there!!!! Don't try shaving when you first turn it on.... And how come my electric bill doesn't really reflect any significant savings??!! I suspect this is just another green boondoggle which benefits some politician or their spouse... And they don't last even one tenth of the advertised time!!!! Lies...all lies!!!!!! GREEN lies....
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by PrinceDraxx Sat May 9, 2009 6:33pm PDT
    What is a "mispercention"? I have used these bulbs since they first started selling them and I'm not dead yet. They aren't as bright as incandescent light bulbs at the same wattage rating, and the ones I've bought generally cost 5 to 10 times as much as an incandescent bulb. Oh, and I have yet to get 5 years of use out of one yet. I'm pretty sure LED lighting is the way to go and these bulbs should be retired gracefully instead of being foisted on the public as the "next best thing" which they obviously are.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Misty J Sat May 9, 2009 6:33pm PDT
    You aren't supposed to throw them in the trash. In my town you are supposed to take them to the dump and they charge YOU $1.00 per bulb to do so.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Yvonne Sat May 9, 2009 6:34pm PDT
    Long life? I bought one and it lasted less than 3 weeks-not even burning 24/7-just regular after dark hours. I hate the light itself. Too bright, not adjustable and I'm really afraid that this is just one more thing that is going to be shoved down our throats "for our own good". Another 'choice' that the government is slowly taking away from us. I like the old light bulbs and I'll continue to use them as long as I'm "allowed".
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by mad C Sat May 9, 2009 6:39pm PDT
    My experience with CFL's in my opinion they are worthless. They are very delicate, The light the put off is inadequate and the have a fairly hi defect rate. Not to mention there hi price. I think they need to R&D these little lovelys a bit more. They Stink!
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by whats up Sat May 9, 2009 6:40pm PDT
    OUR CONGRESS SOLD US OUT TO CHINA... THEY ARE THE OMLY ONES THAT MAKE THEM.....IN 2012 IT WILL BE ALL YOU CAN BUY
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Jim K Sat May 9, 2009 6:41pm PDT
    I bought one and while putting it in the porch light I dropped it and broke it, 16.98 plus tax...so that shot a twenty dollar bill! I was determined to have one on the porch so I went back and bought another one....not knowing that you can't use it connected to a photo cell. The bulb burned out in 10 minutes and I was out a total of approximately $40. I seriously doubt if I spend that much on incandescent bulbs in 3 years. Prices have dropped since then, and I might reconsider, after recovering from that experience.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by mickybrwn@bellsouth.net Sat May 9, 2009 6:41pm PDT
    These bulbs are very very dangerous. They go out with a huge fury when they "burn out." They caused 2 of my lighting fixtures and wiring to be damaged and had to be replaced and rewired. I had one in my bathroom and left it on when I left the house. When I came back one day; it was off and the fixture would not work when new bulbs were put in. Months later, while at home, one of these bulbs in my den "burn out" furiously. It sputtered and made noise and went off and on loudly and I jumped up and turned off the switch. When I put another bulb into the fixture; none would work. I had to have that fixture replaced and the wiring to it, rewired. My brother explained that this type bulb has a ballast in it and he believed me when I relayed my huge concerns over using this type bulb. I wondered if I had not been home to turn off the light in the den, if it could have caused a fire. It truly presented "fireworks" in my otherwise calm, quiet den. I will never use these bulbs again. I rightfully wonder if they have been fire hazards. It has been astonishing to me that others have not pointed out how dramatically they "burn out" and how the fixtures and wiring have resulting damage. I can't be alone in this.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Linda Sat May 9, 2009 6:45pm PDT
    I remember when the Gas company was switching out their metering systems. If the device broke that had mercury in it, the place was quarantined, and the men in masks and special suits came to clean it up. But, now that the gobernut is pushing cfls how convenient it is to say, Oh don't worry if the bulb breaks there's not enough mercury in it to harm you. How about the states that banned thermometers with mercury? I'm so sick of this Gobernut BS I could scream and it's only just begun. God help us all!
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by LoriW Sat May 9, 2009 6:51pm PDT
    We have had to return several to the stores where we bought them because they burned out so quickly (few days to 2 months). How much you want to be that the person behind the counter dropped the CFL in the trash can after we left with the replacement? I'll be you they didn't dispose of it according to the directions for disposal and I'm guessing neither does the average American.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by limepaint@bellsouth.net Sat May 9, 2009 6:53pm PDT
    I Believe that in Natural Reaction, by modifying the nature of the product you can decrease or extend the life of any element . Density will by equal to Consumption basic on my facts the natural saving is about 0.7% on the electrical bill and the profit for the brilliant innovation is approximated. 30 % income.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by johnberkstresser@sbcglobal.net Sat May 9, 2009 6:54pm PDT
    If CFL's are so safe, why do we need to open the window when one breaks?
    Report Abuse

Leave a Comment:

You must first sign in.

Green Picks Playlist