EcoGeek

New air-powered car looks WEIRD

I mean, if you're going to radically change the way a car is powered, you might as well radically change the way it looks too. Right?

I guess that's what MDI (the company who has been pioneering, or at least attempting to pioneer, the compressed-air-powered car for the last 20 years) was thinking when they created the AirPod. I'm not getting any press releases in English, and my French is horrible. But from what I can tell, this new concept is going to roll off the production line in 2009.

The car will be powered by MDI's compressed-air system, which uses electricity to compress huge amounts of air in small tanks. The air is then slowly released from the tanks, driving pistons that move the car. This system is hopefully going into American cars by 2010, and was licensed by Tata Motors for use in India and Europe.

The AirPod seats three (one facing backward) and the "playful and futuristic" design allows for an extremely light-weight and inexpensive vehicle. The top speed of the thing is just over 40 miles per hour and it has a range of only 130 miles before a refill is needed, so obviously it will be just for city use.

Refilling an air car can be extremely quick (if you happen to have an air-car fueling station nearby) or quite slow (if you have to charge using an inexpensive home compressor). But these cars are never dirty. Even if the power used to compress the air is pure-coal-fired power, these things are way cleaner than gasoline, and even cleaner than electric vehicles.

Why? Two reasons. First, their tiny city-specific design means that they're just going to be more efficient. But, second, the fact that the cars require no complicated, metal-filled batteries means that the environmental impact of construction is significantly lower.

Unfortunately, the trade-off is slow speeds and short ranges, which hopefully won't be too much of a detractor ... at least in Europe, which is sure to be the AirPod's initial market.

Of course I want one, but here in America we'll have to wait for the more expensive version that will (hopefully) go on sale in 2010.

Thanks to Bruno for the tip.

Email IM Bookmark del.icio.us Digg

You do not appear to have Yahoo! Messenger installed. Click here to download and install it.

Email this article

There is a problem with one or more email addresses entered

Enter email addresses, separated by commas.

There is a problem with the email address entered

Email addresses will only be used to email this information on your behalf and will not be used for any marketing purposes.

Alerts

Get an alert for updates:
  • from this author
  • on Cars

View All Green Alerts »

comments from our community

Showing 61 - 72 of 72 comments

Post Comment
  • Posted by FrankieS Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:11am PDT
    Cool on the air thing, but think about this before you run out and buy one once they hit market, what the heck would happen to your passangers, like friends... or your KIDS, sitting in the back two seats, when some IDIOT decides to ram into your bumper... Yeah not a smart idea AT ALL, I like the idea, but the design is flawwed, WAY TO MUCH to be a safe vehicle to draive. I mean seriously, you slow to a stop, some IDIOT doesnt catch it in time, SMASH, there goes the back window / door, your kids legs are smooshed and covered in glass, Yeah... takes fender bender to a whole new meaning, no thank you.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by FrankieS Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:12am PDT
    well as for my earlier post, maybe its not glass, maybe a harder less breakable material, be that as it may, its still a stupid, and dangerous design,
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by hot seat Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:30am PDT
    what is the price and list the other qualities of the car
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by AshleyN Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:35am PDT
    ummm... which side is the front?...
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Craig Sun Oct 26, 2008 6:42am PDT
    Any headlights?
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by grannynoswal Sun Oct 26, 2008 8:46am PDT
    posted by AIRTIGHT AIRBAGS SHOULD BE EASILY ADAPTED AND QUITE SAFE. BEST HAVE A REALLY STOUGHT CAR BODY. PROBABLY ONE THAT ABSORBS IMPACT REALLY WELL AND THEN BOUNCES.WITH AIRBAGS IT SHOULD BE AS SAFE AS A PINGPONG BALL. YOU KNOW TAKE A LICKING KEEP ON TICKING. GOOD RIDE FOR THE YOUNG. AND THE YOUNG AT HEART. SURELY IT WILL BE TESTED FOR IMPACT. SHOUD BE SAFE WITH SEATBELTS AND SURROUNDING AIRBAGS.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by sterling2918 Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:15am PDT
    Lets see! If I'am the driver I crawl thru the front window.Passengers enter thru the back window and ride backwards.HHHHuuuuuuummmmmm! Very Interesting!I don't think any insurance co. would write you a policy.I would'nt want to drive on snow or ice in the winter time with this death trap. Sarah
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Tcpa Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:05am PDT
    lets see, greater range, higher top speed, and holds more people than Chryslers peapod. Probably just as safe (except for the speed), and I bet it will cost less. Pumping it up seems to be the problem. Thing to remember is that these are for city use - not highway travel. They are safer than a motorcycle (and yes I ride one to work) because they are more visible and slower. I think it is a great idea - diversity in transportation is key.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by clarkkent22 Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:44pm PDT
    i wouldn't drive one but at least its a step in the right direction.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by DavidW Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:14pm PST
    you can see the american version coming soon...a 6 seater and looks normal and will be under $18k! go to zeropollutionmotors.us to check it all out. very exciting.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by lupita Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:33pm PST
    cool
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by lupita Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:33pm PST
    fantastic
    Report Abuse

Leave a Comment:

You must first sign in.

Green Picks Playlist