31,000 scientists (some dead) refute global warming

comments from our community

• 
  Posted by Lulu bby =] Fri May 15, 2009 1:02pm PDT

  i believe global warming is a real threat if not treated. we need to reduce, reuse, recycle, and try and figure out a better way to live on planet Earth without harming it. Ex. hybrid cars, carpooling, recycling, all these will help our planet and not cause global warming. since the greenhouse effect is already a natural process we are making it worse by emitting more gases into our atmosphere by deforestation, burning of fossil fuels, etc. if we all help our planet and become environmentally friendly then global warming wouldn't be such a threat.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by Jim Mon May 25, 2009 9:06pm PDT

  Ok, so I have a BA with a minor in biology, and I say it's real. End of debate.

  Report Abuse
• 
  Posted by tstedel Sun Nov 22, 2009 2:32am PST

  This is ridiculous, and for some reason it's the first link in google when you type "31000 scientists against global warming". The fact that you dismiss Zhonggang Zeng probably as his PhD doesn't seem to someone who is uneducated as related to Climate study is ridiculous, and instantly makes you lose all credibility. The computer models they use are based on math, besides the data and code, almost entirely. Monckton has with mathematics replicated the results in the 2001 and 2007 IPCC reports consistently in publicly available reports and reported huge exaggerations based on feedback variables that are to this day uncertain. In addition, an economist, Ross McKitrck and Stephen McIntyre are actively and intelligently refuting the graph that was featured in the 2001 IPC Report based on Mike E. Mann et al. Regardless, these people don't have a climate specific PhD, but are still intelligent enough to provide compelling arguments for their cause. Your method of dismissing scientists based on PhD field are ridiculous, and uninformed.

  Report Abuse