The Daily Green

Obama accelerates car efficiency and emission standards

image name
(Photo: Skip ODonnell / iStockPhoto)

President Obama has performed a bit of miracle work: Getting California and the nation's automakers to agree on a set of fairly aggressive new pollution and fuel efficiency rules that ratchet up the U.S. commitment to addressing global warming.

The new rules will boost fuel economy standards ahead of the schedule set by Congress in 2007, resulting in the average car in 2016 getting 35.5 mpg. The new rules also adopt California's carbon dioxide emission limits, which had been disputed by the auto industry and the Bush Administration.

The only difference is that automakers will be given more time to adopt the standards, which will apply nationwide instead of just in California and the dozen states that would have followed its lead had the Environmental Protection Agency granted it the permission it needed to adopt the rules, first set in 2004.

The move by the Obama Administration follows the EPA finding that greenhouse gases endanger public health and the environment, and so can be regulated under the Clean Air Act. (See how carbon regulation may affect your next car.) But today's rulemaking does not use the Clean Air Act to achieve an estimated 40% reduction in pollution.

It does, however, represent another example of the Obama Administration's strong hand on the wheel of the U.S. auto industry. It would not be surprising to find that car makers had little choice but to accept this deal, given that both General Motors and Chrysler have relied on taxpayer loans to stay afloat.

In any case, it shows that Obama is being much more progressive than Congress when looking at the future of the auto industry. The cash for clunkers bill Congress is working on rewards people for buying trucks that get as little as 15 mpg.

In 2009, there were only 14 cars and SUVs that get 30 mpg or better. By 2016, the options on car lots will be much different.

 

More from The Daily Green

Reprinted with permission of Hearst Communications, Inc

Email IM Bookmark del.icio.us Digg

You do not appear to have Yahoo! Messenger installed. Click here to download and install it.

Email this article

There is a problem with one or more email addresses entered

Enter email addresses, separated by commas.

There is a problem with the email address entered

Email addresses will only be used to email this information on your behalf and will not be used for any marketing purposes.

Alerts

Get an alert for updates:
  • from this author
  • on News
  • on Government
  • on Pollution
  • on Cars

View All Green Alerts »

comments from our community

Showing 1 - 5 of 5 comments

Post Comment
  • Posted by angel Wed May 20, 2009 10:30pm PDT
    HAT A GREAT COMMENT!! GO GREEN !!! ALL US LOVE IT.!!!
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Kimberly Tue May 26, 2009 6:45am PDT
    Not that I am against helping the enviornment, but there seems to be a lot of money going into this. How about, instead of spending money on lowering the harmful side effects of cars, how about putting that money into a mass/public transportation system that will require Americans to be less dependant on their cars, therefore helping the environment, and cutting down traffic. Instead of trying to minimize a problem temporarily (and it will be temporary) let's kill two birds with one stone here. Creating a train system would take a lot of work and planning, but think of ALL THE JOBS IT WOULD CREATE!!!!!! not only would it employee millions of people in all different types of jobs, but it will help the environment in the long run!!! create big trains from medium size towns to larger cities... create trolly's for in town transportation.... Obama wants to spend billions.. well... here you go!
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Kelvin N Tue May 26, 2009 8:53pm PDT
    hey ryan m!!!! guess what!!!!! YOU ARE A...REDNECK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! anyways... i think its kind of stupid2 be giving cash 2 people who buy ram 2500s with some newfangled hemi v8 power. hardly anybody needs that. global warming is not really something that can be or needs 2 be proved - you just have 2 open your ignorant eyes, and see the damage that has already been done.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by TomS Wed May 27, 2009 12:08am PDT
    Just wait you government motors car will be small and gas will be 8/10 dollars per gallon with 2/3 of it a tax. Your new electric GM car will go about 40 miles if you do not use the heater and for get the A/C in the summer..The only reason this is coming about is more control of your personnel freedom. If you like what is going on you will be over joyed when your carbon tax hits your house. Think 2/3 times the size of your electric bill..Then how will you like your over priced GM electric.. Tom OKC..
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by Carol Wed May 27, 2009 7:07am PDT
    I think it is great that we are finally doing something about pollution and become greenier all-round. Congress also needs to make the auto industry offer the people another option than buying another vehicle in 7 years. How about the people who cannot afford another car but want to be green. Why not have the car industry offer mechanical upgrades or adjustments to make their cars they already purchased in the last few years greenier.
    Report Abuse

Leave a Comment:

You must first sign in.

Green Picks Playlist