The Daily Green

Kleenex will no longer be made from virgin forests

Greenpeace Kleenex billboard
A billboard posted outside of Kimberly-Clark
headquarters, makers of Kleenex tissues.
This is the NRDC and Greenpeace's latest
step to force the manufactures to use
recycled and sustainable materials in
their products. (Photo: Courtesy of
NRDC and Greenpeace)


Just a few days after Greenpeace claimed victory in pressuring Nike and Timberland to stop buying leather from unsustainable ranches that are deforesting in the Amazon, it is celebrating an agreement with Kimberly-Clark that should stop the unsustainable cutting of forests that go into the making of Kleenex and other paper products.

Greenpeace had waged a five-year campaign it called "Kleercut," targeting Kimberly-Clark for its policies on sourcing forest products.

Kimberly-Clark is the largest tissue maker in the world, producing more than 4 million tons annually, at a profit of billions of dollars. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, the tissue giant owns the Kleenex, Scott, Viva, Cottonelle, Kotex, and Huggies brands. The company had, according to Greenpeace, used "virgin" fiber from clear-cut ancient forests in the Canadian boreal, only to produce disposable tissue products that are used once and discarded.

The company's new policy is to use only wood fiber from environmentally responsible sources. Kimberly-Clark's other brands include Cottonelle and Scott.

Specifically, by the end of 2011, Kimberly-Clark will stop using any forest products derived from the Canadian boreal unless that wood is Forest Stewardship Council certified, and the company will ensure that 40% of its North American tissue fiber is either recycled or Forest Stewardship Council-certified, an increase of more than 70% over 2007 levels.

 

More from The Daily Green

Reprinted with permission of Hearst Communications, Inc


Yahoo! Green is now on Twitter and Facebook! Check us out at http://twitter.com/YahooGreen or http://www.facebook.com/yahoogreen.

Email IM Bookmark del.icio.us Digg

You do not appear to have Yahoo! Messenger installed. Click here to download and install it.

Email this article

There is a problem with one or more email addresses entered

Enter email addresses, separated by commas.

There is a problem with the email address entered

Email addresses will only be used to email this information on your behalf and will not be used for any marketing purposes.

Alerts

Get an alert for updates:
  • from this author
  • on Shopping
  • on Cleaning
  • on Paper

View All Green Alerts »

comments from our community

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 comments

Post Comment
  • Posted by Suman Wed Aug 5, 2009 11:48am PDT
    Cheers to Kleenex/Kimberly-Clark for agreeing to more sustainable practices! Hopefully this won't substantially increase the cost of their products, or else consumers may shift to cheaper competitors who don't care about sustainability.
    Report Abuse
  • Posted by gnaldrich Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:07pm PDT
    Everyones always talking about about saving forrests around the world but yet people are not looking around and seeing the city hire people to kill the trees. they are giving these people permission who have no schooling in agriculture. they say they only trim the trees once a year but there out there 24 seven 7 days a week its ridiculous. Ive asked them why they have done what they did and they said it was for litigation reasons. That's the stupidest reason they could ever give because what they do to the trees makes them fall over. They cut the inside out and leave all the leaves on the end, so they get top heavy and break of. and believe it or not trees do get sunburn so when you cut all the branches out of the center it eventually dies. Also where are all the birds supposed to go and what happens to all the nests?
    Report Abuse

Leave a Comment:

You must first sign in.

Green Picks Playlist