Two reasons Cash for Clunkers should end (and one reason it should live)

A Cash for Clunker display at a dealership
in Maryland. (Photo: Kristoffer Tripplaar /
Sipa Press)

The Daily Green hasn't been a big supporter of Cash for Clunkers program. While it seemed great at first -- a popular cash subsidy that helps taxpayers and car makers and gets junky, highly polluting cars off the road -- in practice, it left a lot to be desired.

As originally conceived, the program would have paid out the same subsidy -- up to $4,500 -- to not only those who bought cars with great fuel economy, but also to those who bought used cars with great fuel economy or who traded in a clunker in exchange for public transportation credits.

In the end, it was designed to sell new cars, whether or not they were highly efficient -- specifically, new cars that get as little as 22 mpg, new SUVs that get as little as 18 mpg, and new trucks that get as little as 15 mpg.

But that's old news. The U.S. people loved the program, exhausting the billion dollar allotment in less than a week. The House of Representatives felt the yank on its chain and passed a $2 billion extension of the program.

Here are two good reasons the Senate should think twice:

1. Even an efficient new car taxes the environment.
You know that Toyota commercial in which the car makes itself out of twigs and then disassembles gently, quietly being absorbed back into the Earth? Well, it's a nice dream.

In reality, it takes steel, paints, solvents, plastics, and a host of other materials to make (that's why car-making employs so many people). There's a point where even an old, inefficient car is less energy and resource-intensive than a brand new car, just because the old car is old.

Gwen Ottinger put this best in the Washington Post: "Building a new car, washing machine, or refrigerator takes energy and resources: The manufacture of steel, aluminum, and plastics are energy-intensive processes, and some of the materials used in durable goods, especially plastics, use nonrenewable fossil fuels as feedstocks as well as energy sources."

Surely some old cars are better off replaced -- whether for environmental or personal reasons. There is some evidence that many cars traded in would have been traded in anyway, with or without the government subsidy.

2. 30% of reusable clunker material is being junked.
By law, the government gives no cash until the clunker is inoperable. By law, that means pouring sodium silicate -- known as "liquid glass" -- into the engine to render it lifeless.

According to Time, that means 30% of the value of a car's parts is lost, along with the energy and resources that went into making them originally. (It's also led to an unexpected boom in sodium silicate chemical manufacturing, according to The Wall Street Journal, at an unspecified environmental cost.)

That's a waste -- even if the provision of the law is there for a reason: To stop the resale of polluting old cars, either here or abroad.

However...
Does all this mean that the Senate should put an end to this popular program? Maybe not. Because the American people seem to be somewhat smarter than their elected representatives: Most are buying fuel-efficient cars, according to federal statistics reported by CNN Money -- exceeding the demands of the law's weak fuel efficiency requirements.

Still, only two or at most five (if those new Honda Civics, Toyota Camrys, and Ford Escapes are the hybrid versions) of the top 10 vehicles consumers are upgrading to are among the 14 2009 cars that get 30 mpg or better.

Maybe the Senate should wise up and learn from the successes and failures of the first Cash for Clunkers program. Before it renews the program, it should ensure that used cars and public transportation qualify for the same credit as new cars, that new cars purchased must meet more strict fuel economy standards, and that more of the junked clunkers can be recycled and reclaimed.

Then, it might be worth another $2 billion. If the program is extended, see how you can magnify your Cash for Clunkers value, for both your wallet and the environment.

Whether or not you're junking a clunker, you can make your driving habits more environmentally friendly. Check out these driving tips, and see how you can go farther on a gallon of gas.

Also see this article from Popular Mechanics: Is the Cash for Clunkers program really raising MPG?

More from The Daily Green

• The 14 2009 Cars That Get Better Than 30 MPG
• How to Pay $1 a Gallon for Gas (or Less)
• Five Little Fuel-Efficient Cars That Dazzled the NY Auto Show
• Eight Micro Cars Set to Take Over the American Road
• The Auto X Prize: Racing for a 100 MPG Car and $10 Million

Reprinted with permission of Hearst Communications, Inc

Yahoo! Green is now on Twitter and Facebook! Check us out at http://twitter.com/YahooGreen or http://www.facebook.com/yahoogreen.