By Keith Gaby
This post is by Keith Gaby, communications director for the national climate campaign at Environmental Defense.
When politicians hesitate to act on global warming, one of the concerns we hear is that cutting the pollution that causes global warming could cost too much. More and more evidence is piling up to show that's just not true. For one, we have to take into account the cost of not doing anything.
But just as important, the cost of doing what we need to is much less than people fear.
Another study, released recently by researchers at McKinsey & Company, shows how much is already in our reach.
It finds that we can cut our projected emissions by at least a third, and possibly as much as one-half, by 2030 — without major technology breakthroughs or lifestyle changes. See more highlights from the study and the full report.
Congress already has plenty of reasons to act quickly. This study shows we have the tools we need. It's time to move!
You do not appear to have Yahoo! Messenger installed. Click here to download and install it.
Kittens who care about climate change now have a web site to call their own.
Thirty-seven miles per gallon in a sporty package is nothing compared to what MINI has up its sleeve next.
The SimpleTech [re]Drive external hard drive is made from recyclable aluminum and bamboo.
Your most environmentally friendly option for heating up anything is...
The average American throws away about 67 pounds of clothing every year. Here's how to stop.
An interactive map for finding people on the same page.