In October of 2007, my house was designated the most inefficient ever recorded in the State of Colorado.
You can imagine my embarrassment. As an analyst at Rocky Mountain Institute, one of the country's leading energy and natural resource think tanks, I should have been walking the talk.
In the heart of one of Boulder's highest rent districts, my husband, Bill, and I thought the old Victorian was a steal. Fire-engine red with white trim and porch, the house has excellent character. It is also split into a duplex, and renting out half made paying the mortgage possible.
We knew we had purchased an inefficient house. In the beginning, we rented out the bottom and lived in the top to save money for improvements (knowing there would be a lot).
The audit
After that first
winter, we had saved enough money to make some improvements and decided to get
a home energy audit so an expert could tell us where we could get the most bang
for our buck.
We found out that the city of Boulder offers rebates through the local resource conservation center, so Bill promptly signed up on the Web site. While there, he saw an advertisement for the annual "Home Energy Makeover Contest," and entered. The contest was put on by our local utility: Xcel Energy and the Smart Energy Living Alliance (SELA), formally known as the Colorado Energy Science Center.
A winning combination
After an exciting and
suspensful selection process, we discovered we had won the Home Energy
Makeover!
This was a huge windfall for us, as once we realized the improvements necessary, we began to think we might not be able to afford the house without it disintegrating into disrepair.
Free home energy improvements meant we could keep the home and live in comfort with low utility bills. In our minds, we had won the lottery.
The upgrades
From November 2007 to
February 2008, the house received completely new insulation everywhere:
fiberglass in the attic, closed-cell foam in the basement, and the walls were
stuffed with cellulose (recycled newspaper composite) blown in from holes
drilled beneath the siding. All the windows were replaced with Argon-filled
double pane glass with a heat mirror. We were even given energy-efficient
Hunter Douglas blinds.
The energy savings continued with the replacement of our archaic furnace (from 40 percent to 95 percent efficient) and our two 40-gallon gas water heaters (58 percent efficient) were replaced from the tankless system by Rinnai.
Water efficiency improvements included low-flow showerheads and, ooo la la, dual flush toilets. I was very surprised that one of our old toilets used a whopping 6 gallons per flush, while the dual uses either 0.9 or 1.5 gallons per flush.
When all was completed, our house was 311 percent more efficient than when they started, and 28 percent better than code-compliant new construction. The improvements cost $45,000 all together and the estimated annual savings is $3,400.
Bringing efficiency home
While not everyone
can afford all these improvements at once, a home energy audit is an excellent
way to find out what improvements will help your house the most.
Home energy audits are quite inexpensive and several cities subsidize the cost of the improvements.
Check this Energy Star resource or this directory to find out about a home energy audit program near you.
Cher Seruto is an analyst with the Built Environment Team at Rocky Mountain Institute.
You do not appear to have Yahoo! Messenger installed. Click here to download and install it.
These recipes will delight guests -- and leave the cook with time to mingle.
Parties and family gatherings mean more chances to catch up -- and catch a cold.
Aren't there some things that you just can't have too much of? Not really.
comments from our community
Showing 1 - 4 of 4 comments
Post Comment